BONIVA is indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
The recommended dose of BONIVA for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis is one 2.5-mg tablet taken once daily or one 150-mg tablet taken once monthly on the same date each month (see Indications and Usage in the full prescribing information).
The recommended dose of BONIVA for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis is one 2.5-mg tablet taken once daily. Alternatively, one 150-mg tablet taken once monthly on the same date each month may be considered (see Indications and Usage in the full prescribing information).
For additional dosing and administration information, please see the full prescribing information.
The recommended dose of BONIVA Injection for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis is 3 mg every 3 months (see INDICATIONS AND USAGE in the full prescribing information) administered over a period of 15 to 30 seconds.
For additional dosing and administration information, please see the full prescribing information.
In a 1-year, double-blind, multicenter study comparing BONIVA 2.5 mg once daily and BONIVA 150 mg once monthly in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, the overall safety and tolerability profiles of the two oral dosing regimens were similar. The incidence of serious adverse events was 4.8% in the BONIVA 2.5 mg daily group and 7.1% in the BONIVA 150 mg once-monthly group. The percentage of patients who withdrew from treatment due to adverse events was approximately 8.9% in the BONIVA 2.5 mg daily group and 7.8% in the BONIVA 150 mg once-monthly group. The table below lists the adverse events reported in >e;2% of patients without attribution of causality.
Taken from Table 4 in the full prescribing information
| Body System/Adverse Event | BONIVA 2.5 mg Daily % (n=395) |
BONIVA 150 mg Monthly % (n=396) |
|---|---|---|
| Vascular Disorders | ||
| Hypertension | 7.3 | 6.3 |
| Gastrointestinal Disorders | ||
| Dyspepsia | 7.1 | 5.6 |
| Nausea | 4.8 | 5.1 |
| Diarrhea | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| Constipation | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Abdominal Paina | 5.3 | 7.8 |
| Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | ||
| Arthralgia | 3.5 | 5.6 |
| Back Pain | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Pain in Extremity | 1.3 | 4.0 |
| Localized Osteoarthritis | 1.3 | 3.0 |
| Myalgia | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Muscle Cramp | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| Infections and Infestations | ||
| Influenza | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| Bronchitis | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Nervous System Disorders | ||
| Headache | 4.1 | 3.3 |
| Dizziness | 1.0 | 2.3 |
| General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions |
||
| Influenza-like Illnessb | 0.8 | 3.3 |
| Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | ||
| Rashc | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| Psychiatric Disorders | ||
| Insomnia | 0.8 | 2.0 |
For additional information on adverse events, please see the full prescribing information.
In a 1-year, double-blind, multicenter study comparing BONIVA Injection administered intravenously as 3 mg every 3 months to BONIVA 2.5 mg daily oral tablet in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, the overall safety and tolerability profiles of the two dosing regimens were similar. The incidence of serious adverse events was 8.0% in the BONIVA 2.5 mg daily group and 7.5% in the BONIVA Injection 3 mg once every 3 months group. The percentage of patients who withdrew from treatment due to adverse events was approximately 6.7% in the BONIVA 2.5 mg daily group and 8.5% in the BONIVA Injection 3 mg every 3 months group.
The table below lists the adverse events reported in ≥2% of patients without attribution of causality.
Taken from Table 4 in the full prescribing information
| Body System/Adverse Event | BONIVA 2.5 mg Daily (Oral) % (n=465) |
BONIVA 3 mg q 3 mo (IV) % (n=469) |
|---|---|---|
| Infections and Infestations | ||
| Influenza | 8.0 | 4.7 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 6.0 | 3.4 |
| Cystitis | 3.4 | 1.9 |
| Gastroenteritis | 3.4 | 1.5 |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| Bronchitis | 2.8 | 2.1 |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | 2.8 | 1.1 |
| Gastrointestinal Disorders | ||
| Abdominal Pain* | 5.6 | 5.1 |
| Dyspepsia | 4.3 | 3.6 |
| Nausea | 4.3 | 2.1 |
| Constipation | 4.1 | 3.4 |
| Diarrhea | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Gastritis | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | ||
| Arthralgia | 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Back Pain | 7.5 | 7.0 |
| Localized Osteoarthritis | 2.4 | 1.5 |
| Pain in Extremity | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| Myalgia | 0.9 | 2.8 |
| Nervous System Disorders | ||
| Dizziness | 2.8 | 1.9 |
| Headache | 2.6 | 3.6 |
| Vascular Disorders | ||
| Hypertension | 7.1 | 5.3 |
| Psychiatric Disorders | ||
| Insomnia | 2.6 | 1.1 |
| Depression | 2.2 | 1.3 |
| General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions | ||
| Influenza-like Illness‡ | 1.1 | 4.9 |
| Fatigue | 1.1 | 2.8 |
| Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | ||
| Rash‡ | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders | ||
| Hypercholesterolemia | 4.3 | 1.5 |
For additional clinical trial information, please click here for tablets and here for injection.
In female rats given oral doses of 1, 4, or 16 mg/kg/day beginning 14 days before mating and continuing through lactation, maternal deaths were observed at the time of delivery in all dose groups (≥3 times human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg or ≥1 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison). Perinatal pup loss in dams given 16 mg/kg/day (45 times human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and 13 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison) was likely related to maternal dystocia. In pregnant rats given oral doses of 6, 20, or 60 mg/kg/day during gestation, calcium supplementation (32 mg/kg/day by subcutaneous injection from gestation day 18 to parturition) did not completely prevent dystocia and periparturient mortality in any of the treated groups (≥16 times human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and ≥4.6 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison). A low incidence of postimplantation loss was observed in rats treated from 14 days before mating throughout lactation or during gestation, only at doses causing maternal dystocia and periparturient mortality. In pregnant rats dosed orally with 1, 5, or 20 mg/kg/day from gestation day 17 through lactation day 21 (following closure of the hard palate through weaning), maternal toxicity, including dystocia and mortality, fetal perinatal and postnatal mortality, were observed at doses ≥5 mg/kg/day (equivalent to human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and ≥4 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison). Periparturient mortality has also been observed with other bisphosphonates and appears to be a class effect related to inhibition of skeletal calcium mobilization resulting in hypocalcemia and dystocia.
Exposure of pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis resulted in an increased fetal incidence of RPU (renal pelvis ureter) syndrome at oral doses ≥10 mg/kg/day (≥30 times human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and ≥9 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison). Impaired pup neuromuscular development (cliff avoidance test) was observed at 16 mg/kg/day when dams were dosed from 14 days before mating through lactation (45 times human exposure at the recommended daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and 13 times human exposure at the recommended once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on AUC comparison). In pregnant rabbits given oral doses of 1, 4, or 20 mg/kg/day during gestation, dose-related maternal mortality was observed in all treatment groups (≥8 times the recommended human daily oral dose of 2.5 mg and ≥4 times the recommended human once-monthly oral dose of 150 mg, based on body surface area comparison, mg/m2). The deaths occurred prior to parturition and were associated with lung edema and hemorrhage. No significant fetal anomalies were observed.
Bisphosphonates are incorporated into the bone matrix, from where they are gradually released over periods of weeks to years. The extent of bisphosphonate incorporation into adult bone, and hence, the amount available for release back into the systemic circulation, is directly related to the total dose and duration of bisphosphonate use. Although there are no data on fetal risk in humans, bisphosphonates do cause fetal harm in animals, and animal data suggest that uptake of bisphosphonates into fetal bone is greater than into maternal bone. Therefore, there is a theoretical risk of fetal harm (eg, skeletal and other abnormalities) if a woman becomes pregnant after completing a course of bisphosphonate therapy. The impact of variables such as time between cessation of bisphosphonate therapy to conception, the particular bisphosphonate used, and the route of administration (intravenous versus oral) on this risk has not been established. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. BONIVA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the mother and fetus.
In pregnant rats given intravenous doses of 0.05, 0.15, or 0.5 mg/kg/day from Day 17 post-coitum until Day 20 post-partum, ibandronate treatment resulted in dystocia, maternal mortality, and early postnatal pup loss in all dose groups (≥2 times human exposure at the recommended intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative AUC comparison). Reduced body weight at birth was observed at 0.15 and 0.5 mg/kg/day (≥4 times human exposure at the recommended intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative AUC comparison). Pups exhibited abnormal odontogeny that decreased food consumption and body weight gain at 0.15 and 0.5 mg/kg/day (≥18 times human exposure at the recommended intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative AUC comparison). Periparturient mortality has also been observed with other bisphosphonates and appears to be a class effect related to inhibition of skeletal calcium mobilization resulting in hypocalcemia and dystocia.
Exposure of pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis resulted in an increased fetal incidence of RPU (renal pelvis ureter) syndrome at an intravenous dose of 1 mg/kg/day (≥47 times human exposure at the recommended intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative AUC comparison). In this spontaneous delivery study, dystocia was counteracted by perinatal calcium supplementation. In rat studies with intravenous dosing during gestation, fetal weight and pup growth were reduced at doses ≥ 0.1 mg/kg/day (≥ 5 times human exposure at the recommended intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative AUC comparison). In pregnant rabbits given intravenous doses of 0.03, 0.07 or 0.2 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis, maternal mortality, reduced maternal body weight gain, decreased litter size due to increased resorption rate, and decreased fetal weight were observed at 0.2 mg/kg/day (19 times the recommended human intravenous dose of 3 mg every 3 months, based on cumulative body surface area comparison, mg/m2).
Bisphosphonates are incorporated into the bone matrix, from where they are gradually released over periods of weeks to years. The extent of bisphosphonate incorporation into adult bone, and hence, the amount available for release back into the systemic circulation, is directly related to the total dose and duration of bisphosphonate use. Although there are no data on fetal risk in humans, bisphosphonates do cause fetal harm in animals, and animal data suggest that uptake of bisphosphonates into fetal bone is greater than into maternal bone. Therefore, there is a theoretical risk of fetal harm (eg, skeletal and other abnormalities) if a woman becomes pregnant after completing a course of bisphosphonate therapy. The impact of variables such as time between cessation of bisphosphonate therapy to conception, the particular bisphosphonate used, and the route of administration (intravenous versus oral) on this risk has not been established. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. BONIVA Injection should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the mother and fetus.